Henry Ford on Innovation

There’s little doubt that Henry Ford was one of the great industrialists and innovators of the 20th century, and I would image he’d be rolling in his grave if he could see what has become of his once-illustrious company. While the staggering powerhouses of Detroit have few examples of stellar management these days, the man who put the Ford name on the map has a surprisingly poignant sentiment that we seem to have forgotten in the 21st century:

If I’d asked people what they wanted, they would have asked for a better horse.

In IT especially, we are obsessed with analyzing the past in the hopes of predicting the future. Rarely does a day go by where I don’t receive a swarm of surveys in my email and postal mailboxes, asking for my opinion on everything from cars, to soap to enterprise technology systems. We’ve made a science out of mining people’s opinion, and to Mr. Ford’s consternation, that is not where we need to look for innovation.

Few revolutionary ideas come from a chorus of the masses begging for some company to come along and implement the idea. In Henry Ford’s time, the benefits and technology of the automobile were virtually unknown to the mass market. If Mr. Ford acted like a modern company and barraged his customers with surveys and focus groups, his analysis would likely conclude that his efforts would indeed best be focused on building a better horse. Intimately familiar with the fact that the past and the market could not understand the automobile’s benefits or his methods for producing them, he threw market research and opinion out the window, freeing himself from the shackles of the past in order to create the industry of the future that would revolutionize transportation as we know it.

While few of us will have the opportunity to create an entirely new industry and change the course of human history, we can take a lesson from Ford’s recognition that the past and public opinion are not the right tools to foster innovation. Consider how your business would be different if you threw out the rule book and did not tolerate “it’s always been done this way” or “this is what our customers want” as valid reasons to continue doing business a certain way. When the market and your peers are asking for a better horse, take a moment to consider if there’s an opportunity to give them an automobile instead.

Speaking in Savannah

Having been a fan of Midnight in the Garden of Good and Evil I’m rather excited that I’ll be speaking next week in Savannah, GA, delivering the following topics:

The IT Talent Crunch?

Innovation in IT

Nothing like spreading a little IT love and good southern cooking!

Why the iPhone Doesn’t Matter

In this video, Walt Mossberg, the tech commentator for the Wall Street Journal, expounds on why the iPhone will revolutionize the mobile phone landscape. While the technology-minded among us might jump on his claims that the iPhone is the first portable device to incorporate a “desktop operating system,” his thoughts miss the larger point: it’s not the hardware and software that make the revolution, rather the services and user experience.

The mobile phone is cited as one of these revolutions, and it’s a perfect example. The mobile phone gave us the ability to “place shift:” take a call wherever and whenever we wanted. The bits and bytes, hardware and software are nifty, but the revolution is that I can have the same 1890′s-style experience of a phone call, just now I can do it sailing down I-90 at 80mph in my Acura. No one cares about the technologies that make it happen, the problems with RF propagation and the rather amazing fact that one call can jump across radio towers, rather we’re excited by the mobility all this other “stuff” affords.

Blackberries, iPhones and the like all have amazing technical capabilities, yet the majority of users get and use the device for mobile email. Again, we’ve taken a technology largely perfected in the 1960′s, and made it pervasive. It’s not because of the operating system or hardware of the device, rather taking a compelling service and “untying” it from the desktop. I can’t think of anyone that laments the differences in kernels running on the devices, or the elegance of the low-level driver code that makes the device work, rather they get excited when the office thinks they’re diligently working away, but they’re really taking a moment to peck at their Blackberry while sitting on the beach.

One of the emerging services my wife and I use constantly is ChaCha (which I found out about from Mossberg). You call 1-800-2-CHACHA and ask them any question (i.e. “What is the current price for a bottle of Dom Perignon ’54?”) and in about 2 minutes they send you a text message with the answer. Again, 1970′s tech (voicemail) + 1980′s tech (text messages) that delivers a revolutionary service unrelated to the underlying device, carrier or network.

We’ve had PC grade processors and operating systems in mobile devices (despite Mossberg’s insistence that Apple is the first) for over 5 years. It’s the new business models and ways to deliver compelling services that will create “game changers,” not the hardware and underlying software.

If anything, this focus on hardware, software and network has actually stifled technical development on many fronts. Rather than focusing on user, service and location independent of device we’ve landed in a morass of megabits per second, CDMA2000 versus WCDMA and gigahertz.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 282 other followers